Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 138
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 455
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Nvidia(10DE 12D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.1% Good
Lighting 78.7
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 66.2
64% 73.9 fps
MRender 90.6
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 74.3
64% 79.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M512C 512GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 169 57 114 172 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 206
Write 181
Mixed 182
SusWrite 110
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 17.8
79% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 67
DQ Mixed 1
13% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 164 187 187 187 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 150
Mixed 66
SusWrite 173
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98%
Great: 106%
Intenso Ultra Line 16GB
9GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.3 7.7 7.6 7.3 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 7.3
13% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 24%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 5.4 5.2 5.4 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 4
Mixed 12
SusWrite 5.1
12% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2.3
98% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
333, 333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback