| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | ECS H61H2-M2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110318 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 12 '20 at 14:39 |
| Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
| Run User | VNM-User |
| Background CPU | 65% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
59.8%
Above average
|
60% 98.4 Pts
|
32% 244 Pts
|
17% 271 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon R9 370
PowerColor(148C 9370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
|
8.65%
Terrible
|
0% 8.07 fps
|
25% 30.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Faspeed K5-128G 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 29 52 32 48 40 MB/s
|
||||
|
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
134GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 59 60 61 62 62 MB/s
|
35.7%
Below average
|
42% 57.2 MB/s
|
121% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
|
17% 23.4 MB/s
|
96% 0.35 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL9 4GB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
40.2%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
48% 82.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61H2-M2 Builds (Compare 683 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M2 - $125
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 97x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 62x |
| Core i5-2310Intel $90Bench 65%, 15,623 samples | 56x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 129x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 56x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $201 |