Today's hottest deals

Asus P5N32-E SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5N32-E SLI  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091117
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 22:36
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 60.9
37% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 95.4
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 23 26 38 30 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 122
Write 131
Mixed 134
SusWrite 34.5
24% 105 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 13.8
58% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 94.3
72% 99 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 85%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
360GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 103 114 99 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 112
Write 143
Mixed 124
SusWrite 108
28% 122 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 18.7
60% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 30.6
DQ Mixed 18.8
16% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
0GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 139
Mixed 73.8
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
428GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 95 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 85.7
Mixed 50
SusWrite 96
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N32-E SLI Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N32-E SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback