| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | EVGA Classified SR-2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 16.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130424 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '20 at 16:09 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
75.2%
Very good
|
65% 106 Pts
|
51% 414 Pts
|
71% 1,153 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.4%
Average
|
50% 62.5 fps
|
49% 61 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 202 208 195 183 201 MB/s
|
69.6%
Good
|
57% 254 MB/s
|
108% 34.5 MB/s
|
131% 191 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C9 5x4GB
5 of 18 slots used
20GB DIMM 1333 MHz
|
50.7%
Above average
|
54% 18.8 GB/s
|
22% 7.6 GB/s
|
64% 62.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 14x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples | 5x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R9 Fury-XAMD $781Bench 59%, 8,241 samples | 6x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $922 |