Average Bench: 58.9% (113th of 715)

Based on 8,241 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 7300 Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury

The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's new high end GPU (Hawaii powers the 290/X and 390/X series cards). The new GPU is coupled with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) which is a new memory architecture that allows for significantly higher bandwidth than previous generations. The Fury X is factory overclocked and has a TDP of just 275W, 4GB of VRAM and it comes fitted with a water cooling system which results in a relatively small form factor for a top end graphics card. Although the Fury X only has 4GB of VRAM, this is rarely a problem for gaming even at 4K resolutions. The key comparable for the Fury X is Nvidia's similarly priced 980 Ti. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

Average average bench

The AMD R9 Fury-X averaged 41.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 77.9fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 88.1fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Fury-X is just 14.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Fury-X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 66.8fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 116fps

Average Bench

(Based on 8,241 samples)
Min Avg Max
66.6 Lighting 77.9 87.6
60.2 Reflection 66.8 71.7
97.6 Parallax 116 133
63.5% 86.8 fps
Min Avg Max
57.6 MRender 61.2 63.8
73.7 Gravity 88.1 97.9
40 Splatting 41.7 43
50.2% 63.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Lighting 84.4
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 135
69% 96.2 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 42.5
53% 67.5 fps
Asus(1043 04A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 75.2
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 111
61% 83.4 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 40.1
49% 62 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 96.5
56% 77.3 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 40.7
47% 59 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 80.7
57% 70.3 fps
MRender 55
Gravity 64
Splatting 37.7
41% 52.2 fps
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 131
0% 66.4 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 96.3
Splatting 41.9
52% 66.7 fps
8,241 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,818,215 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 8,241 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $640 @ launch in Jun '15)
AMD(1002 0B36) 94% 59% ± 5%
AmazonUS $8156 years
Sapphire R9 Fury X 4GB
Gigabyte R9 Fury X 4GB
AmazonUS $7816 years
Asus(1043 04A0) 4% 64% ± 2%
HP(103C 6616) 2% 62% ± 1%
Asus(1043 04A6) 1% 53% ± 2%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 Fury-X Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 47%
Desktop 76%
Workstation 47%

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922

Popular R9 Fury-X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added 8 years ago.

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

10 days ago.


Witcher 3 1080p Maxed - No Hairworks 88fps Novigrad 63fps Swamp while on horseback (water and heavy foliage) Hits over 144 Fps in Dota 2 and CS:GO with ease Battlefield 1 - Max settings on Beta Map DX12 using 9590 @ 4.6ghz 155 Fps Top 110 Fps Average 90fps Low (excluding long framtime drops DX12 was still buggy) For $350 Paired with a Freesync monitor a great buy.—Nov '16


18 months ago.

i have both, but the R9's graphics are better on the eyes/smoother than the 1050 GTX, i love the Red RGB and i also love that its water cooled, it goes well with my set up


6 months ago.

After all these years, still powerful enough for a great setting in the most popular games. Additionally 3xDP Ports for 3 nice Displays :)


2 years ago.

Shockingly. this card years after release might still be a very solid small form factor GPU as long as you can find one used and do the maintenance on it's aging watercooler.


18 months ago.

Got a R9 Nano, 'bench say it's a R9 Fury-X at 16% below average, feel so good :)


3 years ago.

For me this card is an outstanding, moved from Sapphire Nitro R9 390 8GB, i really like the watercooling, since it easily removes heat from case, so i could slow down all the Noctuas and make the PC more quieter and more powerfull.


5 years ago.



4 years ago.

Did not age well due to 4GB and even worse is the damn pumps dying...


8 years ago.


5 years ago.

Great temps, great performance in games, affordable. Competetive with nvidia top tier cards.


4 years ago.

Probably one of the only GPU to come with 120mm AIO cooler as a reference cooler. Was the computing beast back in the day though.


5 years ago.

Once a king. Now it's just a bad value card.


4 years ago.

Liquid cooling = more problems. Not to mention, the Fury (non-X) with 512 fewer streaming processors (8 fewer compute units) performs just about as well as or better than the Fury X. Similar situation with the newer Vega 56/64.

715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback