Average Bench: 65.6% (70th of 667)

Based on 9,840 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 7300 Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury

The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's new high end GPU (Hawaii powers the 290/X and 390/X series cards). The new GPU is coupled with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) which is a new memory architecture that allows for significantly higher bandwidth than previous generations. The Fury X is factory overclocked and has a TDP of just 275W, 4GB of VRAM and it comes fitted with a water cooling system which results in a relatively small form factor for a top end graphics card. Although the Fury X only has 4GB of VRAM, this is rarely a problem for gaming even at 4K resolutions. The key comparable for the Fury X is Nvidia's similarly priced 980 Ti. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

Above average average bench

The AMD R9 Fury-X averaged 34.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 78.2fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 89.7fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Fury-X is just 16.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Fury-X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 67.6fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 117fps

Average Bench

(Based on 9,840 samples)
Min Avg Max
65 Lighting 78.2 86.2
60.7 Reflection 67.6 70.1
96.5 Parallax 117 134
63.2% 87.6 fps
Min Avg Max
57.2 MRender 61.4 63.7
73.5 Gravity 89.7 98
39.6 Splatting 41.8 42.9
68.4% 64.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 85.3
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 126
69% 93.7 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 92.9
Splatting 42.8
71% 66.1 fps
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Lighting 82.8
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 131
67% 94 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 96.2
Splatting 42.5
73% 67.2 fps
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Lighting 82.2
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 126
66% 92.5 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 42.8
74% 67.6 fps
9,840 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 48,022,849 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 9,840 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $640 @ launch in Jun '15)
AMD(1002 0B36) 90% 65% ± 7%
AmazonUS $8153 years
Sapphire R9 Fury X 4GB
Gigabyte R9 Fury X 4GB
AmazonUS $7813 years
Asus(1043 04A0) 8% 70% ± 4%
Asus(1043 04A6) 1% 61% ± 4%
HP(103C 6616) 0% 67% ± 5%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 Fury-X Builds (Compare 99,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 59%
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 57%

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $1,316

Popular R9 Fury-X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added 6 years ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

3 months ago.


Witcher 3 1080p Maxed - No Hairworks 88fps Novigrad 63fps Swamp while on horseback (water and heavy foliage) Hits over 144 Fps in Dota 2 and CS:GO with ease Battlefield 1 - Max settings on Beta Map DX12 using 9590 @ 4.6ghz 155 Fps Top 110 Fps Average 90fps Low (excluding long framtime drops DX12 was still buggy) For $350 Paired with a Freesync monitor a great buy.—Nov '16


8 months ago.

i have both, but the R9's graphics are better on the eyes/smoother than the 1050 GTX, i love the Red RGB and i also love that its water cooled, it goes well with my set up


1 month ago.

After all these years, still powerful enough for a great setting in the most popular games. Additionally 3xDP Ports for 3 nice Displays :)


18 months ago.

Got a R9 Nano, 'bench say it's a R9 Fury-X at 16% below average, feel so good :)


9 months ago.

Shockingly. this card years after release might still be a very solid small form factor GPU as long as you can find one used and do the maintenance on it's aging watercooler.


12 months ago.

For me this card is an outstanding, moved from Sapphire Nitro R9 390 8GB, i really like the watercooling, since it easily removes heat from case, so i could slow down all the Noctuas and make the PC more quieter and more powerfull.


2 years ago.



17 months ago.

Did not age well due to 4GB and even worse is the damn pumps dying...


6 years ago.


3 years ago.

Great temps, great performance in games, affordable. Competetive with nvidia top tier cards.


16 months ago.

this gpu is 1660 super analog permornance , first card with hbm vram. but 4gb is poor for top gpu, weaker r9 390 or rx 480 kill this gpu in vram demanding games


4 years ago.

very high price


2 years ago.

Probably one of the only GPU to come with 120mm AIO cooler as a reference cooler. Was the computing beast back in the day though.


2 years ago.

Once a king. Now it's just a bad value card.


2 years ago.

Liquid cooling = more problems. Not to mention, the Fury (non-X) with 512 fewer streaming processors (8 fewer compute units) performs just about as well as or better than the Fury X. Similar situation with the newer Vega 56/64.

667 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback