Average Bench: 65.1% (81st of 685)

Based on 8,776 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 7300 Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury

The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's new high end GPU (Hawaii powers the 290/X and 390/X series cards). The new GPU is coupled with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) which is a new memory architecture that allows for significantly higher bandwidth than previous generations. The Fury X is factory overclocked and has a TDP of just 275W, 4GB of VRAM and it comes fitted with a water cooling system which results in a relatively small form factor for a top end graphics card. Although the Fury X only has 4GB of VRAM, this is rarely a problem for gaming even at 4K resolutions. The key comparable for the Fury X is Nvidia's similarly priced 980 Ti. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

Above average average bench

The AMD R9 Fury-X averaged 34.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 78.1fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 88.1fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Fury-X is just 16.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Fury-X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 67.3fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 116fps

Average Bench

(Based on 8,776 samples)
Min Avg Max
66.8 Lighting 78.1 87.7
61.6 Reflection 67.3 72.6
97.3 Parallax 116 133
63.1% 87 fps
Min Avg Max
57.9 MRender 61.4 65.1
74.3 Gravity 88.1 97.9
40 Splatting 41.7 44.4
67.4% 63.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 126
68% 93.4 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 42.9
74% 67.9 fps
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 82.6
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 126
67% 92.7 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 42.8
74% 67.8 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 107
56% 81 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 40.7
59% 58.9 fps
8,776 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 55,356,497 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 8,776 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $640 @ launch in Jun '15)
AMD(1002 0B36) 95% 65% ± 7%
AmazonUS $8154 years
Sapphire R9 Fury X 4GB
Gigabyte R9 Fury X 4GB
AmazonUS $7814 years
Asus(1043 04A0) 3% 69% ± 3%
HP(103C 6616) 1% 69% ± 3%
Asus(1043 04A6) 1% 57% ± 1%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 Fury-X Builds (Compare 15,653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 58%
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 55%

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $1,189

Popular R9 Fury-X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added 7 years ago.

Disliked (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.


Witcher 3 1080p Maxed - No Hairworks 88fps Novigrad 63fps Swamp while on horseback (water and heavy foliage) Hits over 144 Fps in Dota 2 and CS:GO with ease Battlefield 1 - Max settings on Beta Map DX12 using 9590 @ 4.6ghz 155 Fps Top 110 Fps Average 90fps Low (excluding long framtime drops DX12 was still buggy) For $350 Paired with a Freesync monitor a great buy.—Nov '16


18 months ago.

i have both, but the R9's graphics are better on the eyes/smoother than the 1050 GTX, i love the Red RGB and i also love that its water cooled, it goes well with my set up


11 months ago.

After all these years, still powerful enough for a great setting in the most popular games. Additionally 3xDP Ports for 3 nice Displays :)


2 years ago.

Got a R9 Nano, 'bench say it's a R9 Fury-X at 16% below average, feel so good :)


10 months ago.

Shockingly. this card years after release might still be a very solid small form factor GPU as long as you can find one used and do the maintenance on it's aging watercooler.


22 months ago.

For me this card is an outstanding, moved from Sapphire Nitro R9 390 8GB, i really like the watercooling, since it easily removes heat from case, so i could slow down all the Noctuas and make the PC more quieter and more powerfull.


3 years ago.



2 years ago.

Did not age well due to 4GB and even worse is the damn pumps dying...


7 years ago.


3 years ago.

Great temps, great performance in games, affordable. Competetive with nvidia top tier cards.


2 years ago.

this gpu is 1660 super analog permornance , first card with hbm vram. but 4gb is poor for top gpu, weaker r9 390 or rx 480 kill this gpu in vram demanding games


5 years ago.

very high price


2 years ago.

Probably one of the only GPU to come with 120mm AIO cooler as a reference cooler. Was the computing beast back in the day though.


3 years ago.

Once a king. Now it's just a bad value card.


3 years ago.

Liquid cooling = more problems. Not to mention, the Fury (non-X) with 512 fewer streaming processors (8 fewer compute units) performs just about as well as or better than the Fury X. Similar situation with the newer Vega 56/64.

685 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $530Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $400Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback