bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1176 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '17 at 08:52
Run Duration497 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 76
2-Core 152
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 584
52% 440 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 54GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 97.3
Mixed 96.1
71% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.22
4K Write 7.95
4K Mixed 5.38
1,004% 6.52 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 87%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 34.1
Mixed 34.8
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.78
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 1.8
319% 2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 88%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 36.9
Mixed 51.6
32% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.88
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 1.4
285% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 88%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 35.5
Mixed 79.7
37% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.63
4K Mixed 5.38
729% 3.34 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 19.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback