Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz 3,160 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 6.3 2-Core 14.5 22% 26 Pts	4-Core 20.9 8-Core 21 3% 21 Pts	64-Core 7.8 0% 7.8 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6800 269 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0245) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	0.27% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.58 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.27% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 41 66 67 56 73 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.6% Very poor	Read 34.9 Write 56.6 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 58.2 10% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 7.7 17% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 124%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 19 19 18 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 17.5 Write 20.2 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 17.8 26% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x1GB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3 of 4 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	5.88% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 0.4 4% 1.6 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.3 SC Mixed 0.1 0% 0.17 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 5.88% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM