| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | DELL 0X501H |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091026 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '21 at 08:01 |
| Run Duration | 107 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.9%
Good
|
62% 100 Pts
|
40% 309 Pts
|
22% 349 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
103%
Outstanding
|
105% 133 fps
|
100% 123 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 105 156 166 154 152 MB/s
|
95.7%
Outstanding
|
109% 149 MB/s
|
222% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 6 slots used
3GB DIMM
|
39.7%
Below average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
28% 9.93 GB/s
|
57% 70.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 473 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 324x |
| Core i7 960Intel $217Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 20x |
| Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 39x |
| GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $174 |