Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 02 '20 at 23:50
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 53.5 1-Core 100 2-Core 173 60% 109 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 633 66% 529 Pts	64-Core 632 39% 632 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3752) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 98.5 Parallax 97.2 84% 99.8 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 94.2 Splatting 80.7 80% 101 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8240G 240GB 3,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 105 139 81 89 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 434 Write 401 Mixed 330 SusWrite 130 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 41.9 144% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 149 142% 225 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$105 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 664GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 127 131 127 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 136 Write 138 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 129 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D32AET4K.M8FE1 2x8GB 2,427 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.8% Good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 22 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	109x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	95x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	83x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	74x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	42x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	36x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $532

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16