Samsung 670Z5E

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Samsung 670Z5E (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP670Z5E-X01IT
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '17 at 14:54
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3635QM 2,986 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 182 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 456 51% 399 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M200X 678 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Sanyo(144D C0E7) 2GB CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 11.7 9% 11.5 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 15.4 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1738 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 127 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 59 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 22 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1960084461	72.8% Very good	Read 514 Write 414 Mixed 416 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 17.6 85% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 85.2 52% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-422.A00LF Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 670Z5E Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 670Z5E

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	42x
Core i7-3635QMIntelBench 62%, 2,986 samples	12x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	53x
Radeon HD 8800MAMDBench 5%, 48 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples	26x
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GBKingstonBench 43%, 12 samples	4x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GBSamsungBench 51%, 275 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16