Aaronn OPS-ASL6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAaronn OPS-ASL6  (all builds)
MotherboardAaronn OPS-Slotin PC
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 02:36
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 135
56% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 148
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 510
Intel(8086 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8187
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 3.25
2% 3.61 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.73
Splatting 8.13
5% 5.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-SMSM4-64G-S9C 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FMA028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 62 55 65 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 398
Write 88.7
Mixed 102
SusWrite 61
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 17.3
85% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 90.9
DQ Mixed 3.5
33% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback