Today's hottest deals

Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X79-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 17:45
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 195
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 483
54% 427 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0784) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.59% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 10.2
9% 11.2 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 14.1
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 65 57 54 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
1GB free
Firmware: DC02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,666
Write 62
Mixed 112
266% 1,280 MB/s
4K Read 634
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 7.7
972% 215 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 91%
Seagate ST8000DM0004-1ZC11G 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 173 181 172 180 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
32GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 47 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 48
Write 48.2
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 45.9
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.1% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback