Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 14:57
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 58.5
40% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 148
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Asus(1043 830F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 1.31
3% 3.06 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 2.91
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
717GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 70 35 67 68 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 32.1
Write 56.7
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 75.2
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
63% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 156 156 160 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 156
Write 153
Mixed 39
SusWrite 157
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 6 6 6.1 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 24.6
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 6.2
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 70%
TrekStor DS maxi classic 1TB
381GB free, PID 0020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 16.9
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 6.1
24% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 17%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 25.9
Mixed 25
SusWrite 6.1
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 75%
TrekStor DS maxi light 2TB
1TB free, PID 003f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 25.6
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 6.1
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 28%
TrekStor DS maxi pace 3.0 3TB
2TB free, PID 007d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 22.9
Write 24.6
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 6.1
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 79%
TrekStor DS maxi light 2TB
513GB free, PID 003f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 6 6.1 6.1 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Read 27.8
Write 25.5
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 6.1
26% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 28%
TrekStor DS maxi Xpress 1TB
56GB free, PID 0039
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Read 29.8
Write 25.9
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 6.1
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $326
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback