Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191224
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	May 18 '20 at 16:25
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 153 52% 93.6 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 384 35% 296 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.20.36.03 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.1% Above average	Lighting 76 Reflection 80.2 Parallax 74.1 62% 76.7 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 62 39% 44.6 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 38 26 9.3 90 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 1,103 Write 795 Mixed 782 SusWrite 92.6 154% 693 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 50.2 170% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 481 DQ Mixed 222 220% 346 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 209%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 291GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 50 65 74 68 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 122 Write 27 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 65.8 50% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.7 200% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB 206 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61.7% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 21.8 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	493x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	301x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16