Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Octavia_PKS
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 17:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 14.7
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 154
44% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 442
44% 357 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Acer(1025 1366) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 16.5
12% 30.2 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 12
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 19 25 24 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 5,006
Write 36.7
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 21.9
267% 1,285 MB/s
4K Read 419
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 5.1
642% 142 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 372%
Great: 153%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
189GB free
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 12 13 16 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-025.A00G Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 26
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 362
11% 362 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-43 Builds (Compare 1,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback