Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '17 at 04:29
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 52.6 2-Core 106 51% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 284 30% 237 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.3% Excellent	Lighting 98.3 Reflection 121 Parallax 115 80% 111 fps	MRender 96.2 Gravity 100 Splatting 98.7 81% 98.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 43837775 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 77163382473139 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 905 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 242 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 80 1005027590170 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 43837775 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 43837775 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 43837775 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 30282 (EA) Unknown 0 0 22620 (F1) Unknown 0 0 22620 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14963	37.6% Below average	Read 146 Write 83.6 Mixed 106 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 10.6 77% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 78.4 DQ Mixed 27.9 42% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 75GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 170 4008 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7765 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 37 37 46481 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1708 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 326 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7438 (C2) HDA temperature 111 94 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 198 140	52.8% Above average	Read 84.1 Write 99.7 Mixed 87.4 68% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 52GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 21788344 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5422 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 8685484444 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 28584 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 548 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 50 622002209 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 140 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 55 55 91460 (C2) HDA temperature 33 50 12884901921 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 27556510184181 (F1) Unknown 100 253 29179553627 (F2) Unknown 100 253 46827799607	82.6% Excellent	Read 146 Write 142 Mixed 138 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.26 89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 114%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB 8,379 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 39GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 49.9 Write 45.5 Mixed 38.6 56% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.22 74% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 45%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 24GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 29 Write 26.4 Mixed 22.6 33% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.27 59% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.5% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 9 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16