Positivo C14CR21

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo C14CR21  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo C14CR21
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 22:36
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 51.7
32% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 64.1
8-Core 64.2
9% 64.1 Pts
64-Core 71.6
4% 71.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BEVS-22RST0 80GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 10 23 32 30 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 2.9
Write 5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 21.2
6% 8.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
13% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG HB3SU004GFM8MMB33 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C14CR21 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CR21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback