ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion FR516AA-AB9 m9475pt

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion FR516AA-AB9 m9475pt (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080905
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '20 at 19:16
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	48% Average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 76.7 41% 62 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 150 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450 10,238 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 3000) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.96 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 474GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 50 57 54 56 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 71.8 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 55.2 45% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 51%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB 2,004 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 53GB free Firmware: 3.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 65 67 66 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 51.5 Write 14 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 66.3 31% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 37%
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB 241GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.6% Very poor	Read 20.2 Write 10.5 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 20.7 24% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.67 MB/s

TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 51GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 20 20 21 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 27.3 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 20.7 33% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 23GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 29 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 20.1 36% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 62%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 66GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 29 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 20 34% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.8 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback