Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '22 at 13:32
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 91.4 1-Core 109 2-Core 244 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 758 74% 607 Pts	64-Core 959 59% 959 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 263 241 236 231 229 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 2,447 Write 347 Mixed 609 SusWrite 256 197% 914 MB/s	4K Read 50.9 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 69 238% 85.6 MB/s	DQ Read 989 DQ Write 572 DQ Mixed 803 592% 788 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 29GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 133 129 123 118 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 470 Mixed 415 SusWrite 162 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 55.4 187% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 355 268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 115%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 196GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 101 103 98 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 89 Write 89.8 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 101 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 130 131 131 130 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 135 Write 116 Mixed 89 SusWrite 131 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 684GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 83 81 82 81 81 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 74.7 Write 51.1 Mixed 49.1 SusWrite 80.4 47% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 59%
WD Elements 107C 5TB 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 38.9 Write 39.7 Mixed 34 SusWrite 41.5 53% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 66%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 438GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 40.2 Write 39.5 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 42.7 52% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.6% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 21 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 21.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	109x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	95x
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	83x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	74x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	42x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	36x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $545

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16