Today's hottest deals

Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '17 at 18:15
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 119
52% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 21.3
19% 20.8 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 17.1
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
573GB free
Firmware: 1AG0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 67.7
Write 105
Mixed 82.8
64% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
96% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 58%
Maxtor 6 L250S0 251GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BACE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 44.8
Mixed 41.2
33% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 4.57
4K Mixed 0.36
149% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 15.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback