Acer Aspire M3300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M3300
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3300  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091116
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 21:29
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 810
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 75.3
42% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 149
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Diamond(1092 E101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 3.78
5% 5.92 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 7.26
5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 198 199 205 205 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.3% Good
Read 205
Write 177
Mixed 199
SusWrite 201
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 32.9
114% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 144
108% 145 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
744GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 95 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 76.3
Write 79.1
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 93.7
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 57%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
904GB free
Firmware: 0410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 30.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 33
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 58%
Generic- SD/MMC 197GB
142GB free, PID 0181
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 17.4
Write 14.1
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 14.9
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.3
150% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston None None 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.6% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3300 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Acer Aspire M3300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback