Today's hottest deals

Asus M4N68T LE V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T LE V2  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 810
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 79
46% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 150
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3470
Sapphire(174B E390) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 30 34 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 9.5
Write 9
Mixed 16
SusWrite 32.6
12% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 43%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 7
5% 7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T LE V2 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T LE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback