Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '17 at 14:02
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 650
67% 539 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 142
Parallax 128
114% 136 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 135
Splatting 108
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT256G1122 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 475
Write 324
Mixed 384
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 3.91
101% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 21.3
30% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 66TB
27TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.8% Good
Read 116
Write 113
Mixed 97.1
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.28
106% 1.1 MB/s
Microsoft Virtual Disk 5.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.3% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 119
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.27
101% 1.02 MB/s
Microsoft Virtual Disk 55TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.3% Good
Read 81.3
Write 132
Mixed 113
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.3
103% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 11TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 106
Write 136
Mixed 97.9
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.26
104% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$58
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 86
Write 109
Mixed 105
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.28
110% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 96%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 11TB
926GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
Read 116
Write 147
Mixed 113
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.25
97% 1.02 MB/s
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB
439GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 112
Write 120
Mixed 100
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.21
78% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 20.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $614
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback