Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '17 at 16:18
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 476
64% 477 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3769) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 44.2
27% 35.9 fps
MRender 43.1
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 34.3
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
123GB free
Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 484
Write 341
Mixed 341
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 15.1
106% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 44.8
58% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 99%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 69.8
Mixed 55.3
45% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.19
63% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback