Today's hottest deals

Lenovo IdeaCentre K330

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo IdeaCentre K330  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 07:32
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 153
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 296
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
MSI(1462 3822) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 119
0% 57.6 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 73.7
56% 67.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 19%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3FE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 65 57 49 82 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 139
Write 134
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 69.3
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 74%
SDHC Card 8GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.3 5.3 4.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 5.4
11% 9.78 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.8
99% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1870EF48E8W1333 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IdeaCentre K330 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo IdeaCentre K330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback