Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3360 x 1890 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 14:28
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6134
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 184
60% 109 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 190
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P4-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 1205) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.08
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.1% Average
Lighting 78
Reflection 65
Parallax 74.8
64% 72.6 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,607
Write 2,152
Mixed 2,587
546% 2,449 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 67.1
235% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 227
178% 251 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4.9
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback