Asus A6JC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory1.5GB is enough RAM for Windows XP.
OS VersionWindows XP is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (1.5GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.
SystemAsus A6JC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A6JC
Memory1 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit цв.
OSWindows XP
BIOS Date20060127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '15 at 12:31
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T2400
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 44.1
15% 33.2 Pts
4-Core 44.2
8-Core 44.5
6% 44.3 Pts
64-Core 45.5
3% 45.5 Pts
Poor: 18% Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300
Asus(1043 1212) 512MB
Driver: nv4_disp.dll Ver. 6.14.11.9801
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.23
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.14%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080AT PL 80GB
59GB free (System drive)
Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 26.1
Mixed 16.2
17% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.18
57% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 15%
JetFlash Transcend 8G 8GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 5.97
Mixed 8.43
14% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.44
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.33
40% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 14%
Typical A6JC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus A6JC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback