Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive14.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 13:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 82
2-Core 153
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 309
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 22 22 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.9% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 39.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 21.5
6% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 13.1
35% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 15.2
12% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 34GB
29GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.3% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 17.1
7% 30 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 14
45% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
1024, 15360 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback