PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090819 |
Uptime | 12.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 07 '20 at 16:36 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
73.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760 Ti OEM
Nvidia(10DE 1074) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.25
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 186 109 107 102 67 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 33 33 33 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
Hua722020ala330 42D0788 42D0791IBM 2TB
93GB free
Firmware: JKAOA34H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 62 63 63 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |