Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550 1,356 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 146 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 528 49% 406 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 Ti OEM 1,817 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 1074) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (80^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.8% Poor	Lighting 29.7 Reflection 35.2 Parallax 41.8 24% 35.6 fps	MRender 46.1 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 34.8 32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 115 54 131 82 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 230 Write 210 Mixed 190 SusWrite 122 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 8.2 45% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 148 116% 160 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 88%
Hua722020ala330 42D0788 42D0791IBM 2TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 163GB free Firmware: JKAOA34H SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 113 114 77 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 106 Write 111 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 107 70% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 68%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 694GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 35 34 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 137 Write 33 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 33.3 42% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CF8 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:80... 50GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1066, 1333, 1333, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 6.1 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16