Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '17 at 14:52
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 71.1
42% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 77.7
8-Core 84.4
11% 81.1 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D + HD 6670 Dual Graphics
MSI(1462 8111) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 7
6% 7.11 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 5.3
5% 5.72 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 74.5
Write 68.7
Mixed 68.2
53% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.12
48% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$60
200GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 70
Write 66.6
Mixed 47.4
46% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.28
79% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
168GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 94.8
Mixed 89.1
69% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback