Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 01:42
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,112
102% 855 Pts
64-Core 2,155
133% 2,155 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 90.5
59% 74.9 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 78.3
57% 68.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 157 74 76 76 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 534
Mixed 539
SusWrite 147
114% 514 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 28.8
129% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 164
172% 272 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid ADATA SU800 512GB
427GB free
Firmware: R042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 187 118 127 92 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 466
Write 472
Mixed 434
SusWrite 136
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 25.6
97% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 135
129% 193 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 80%
Amd-raid Hitachi HDS72101 1TB
140GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 45 29 34 28 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47% Average
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 37.6
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47%
Great: 74%
Amd-raid ST31000524AS 1TB
438GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 63 40 49 39 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 99.9
Write 99.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 53.3
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 40.5
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback