Acer Aspire X3300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire X3300  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer WMCP78M
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 17 '20 at 03:10
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 81.7
46% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 151
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200
Acer(1025 0227) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.61 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.78
1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 87 105 84 104 69 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 126
Write 96
Mixed 109
SusWrite 91.3
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 23.9
72% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 52.2
DQ Write 55.5
DQ Mixed 63.7
45% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 128%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
65GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 32 33 32 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 32.5
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 32.4
7% 33 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 6.1
22% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 10%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
280GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 135 112 135 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 138
Write 91.6
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 122
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
272GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 33 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 31.4
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 31.8
39% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 43%
Multiple Flash Reader 0GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 10.2
Write 7.8
Mixed 8
11% 8.67 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 0% Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3300 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback