Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6180 SE 12 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 17.5 2-Core 47 30% 41.7 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 215 19% 160 Pts	64-Core 878 54% 878 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM240 240GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: 204Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 281 282 282 282 282 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 286 Write 283 Mixed 224 SusWrite 281 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 26.2 88% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 201 163% 231 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 83%
WD WD1004FBYZ-01YCBB1 1TB 802 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 931GB free Firmware: RR07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 192 191 192 193 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 229 Mixed 186 SusWrite 193 152% 205 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.1 462% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273CH0-YH9 8x4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 8 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $175Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503