Today's hottest deals

Asus UX461UN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus UX461UN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX461UN
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 12:33
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 59
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 174
56% 102 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 276
24% 208 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1C90) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 14
Parallax 7.72
3% 8.59 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 8.96
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$63
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 509 690 488 1011 894 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,374
Write 59.3
Mixed 148
SusWrite 703
124% 571 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 36.4
167% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 773
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 357
305% 462 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 171%
Great: 372%
Amicro AM8180 NVME 512GB
276GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 288 302 323 328 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 246
Write 252
Mixed 163
SusWrite 304
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 13.1
47% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 140
104% 137 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate Ultra Slim MT 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 123 124 126 126 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 85.8
Write 108
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 120
74% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.1
126% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 21
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX461UN Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX461UN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $152Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback