Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570S AERO G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AERO G  (all builds)
Memory37.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 20:40
Run Duration366 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$228
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 175
2-Core 351
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 1,093
104% 860 Pts
64-Core 2,321
144% 2,321 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
ASRock(1849 5201) ≥ 4GB; Asus Taichi
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 241
Parallax 434
174% 296 fps
MRender 378
Gravity 168
Splatting 321
238% 289 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 177%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$198
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,792
Write 3219
Mixed 2,876
664% 2,962 MB/s
4K Read 77
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 104
335% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 1022
771% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
398GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2055 1950 1970 1980 1972 1973 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,505
Write 2,373
Mixed 2,006
SusWrite 1,984
499% 2,217 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 64.2
233% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1338
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 1,078
822% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 343%
Great: 435%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
254GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 453 289 253 251 252 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 445
Write 447
Mixed 382
SusWrite 325
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 38.2
133% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 209
157% 210 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 99%
Pcie SSD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2520 2558 1984 1124 1111 1120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 1,488
Write 1,948
Mixed 1,701
SusWrite 1,736
390% 1,719 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 77.8
270% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 1,037
DQ Mixed 1,150
880% 1,200 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 303%
Great: 309%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.5 9.8 9.6 10 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.4% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 32
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 9.5
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
200% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate Ultra Slim MT 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 33.1
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 10.5
20% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 66%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
606GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 31.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 10.5
18% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
148% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 2TB
2TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.4 8.2 8.7 8.4 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 24.3
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 9
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 44%
WD easystore 264D 12TB
10.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 36.4
Write 35.8
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 36.4
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.5
209% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3200C14-16GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3200C14-16GTZR 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 26
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570S AERO G Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AERO G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $993
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback