Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V5-573P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-573P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_HW
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130829
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 23:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GHA-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 78.7
46% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 117
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics Family (PHDGD Skylake v2.9)
Acer(1025 079B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 3.0.64.2016
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 4.94
3% 4.73 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 7.91
5% 5.44 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 11 5.4 33 39 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 38
Write 27.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 25.2
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 14.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-573P Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-573P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback