Asrock 760GM-GS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-GS3  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120328
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 18:50
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 109
55% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 213
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
PwrHis(1787 2291) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1002
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.78
1% 1.84 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.26
2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 238GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 346 175 62 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 415
Write 332
Mixed 295
SusWrite 172
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 23.8
102% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 155
116% 155 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 58.1
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 98.3
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 16.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-GS3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-GS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback