HP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18FA
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160726
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '20 at 20:26
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 120
57% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 2.62
3% 3.82 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7.26
4% 4.45 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 79 79 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 83.7
Write 77.3
Mixed 50
SusWrite 76.1
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 50%
JMicron 512GB
168GB free, PID 2561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 357 357 358 321 329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 316
Write 206
Mixed 279
SusWrite 344
386% 287 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 15.1
1,278% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 28.8
DQ Mixed 16.6
1,608% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 188%
Great: 188%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FH8NZQNSCG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback