PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds) |
Memory | 22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150804 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 15 '20 at 04:41 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 331 244 237 237 238 MB/s
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
68GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 96 96 MB/s
|
49.2%
Average
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
736GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 126 125 127 126 MB/s
|
76.8%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
544GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 83 80 84 86 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 139x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 29x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 22x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $490 |