Asus P8H61-M LE/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/BR  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 23:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 95
2-Core 185
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 360
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.74% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 7.44
7% 9.06 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 10
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 7.74%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
667GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 59 83 111 133 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 99
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 89%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
376GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 88 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 84.3
Write 83.6
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 83.8
53% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/BR Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback