Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6260U 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 80.5 1-Core 83.1 2-Core 149 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 232 31% 230 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540 6,448 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Intel(8086 2063) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7989 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.68% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 11.2 8% 10.4 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 14.9 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.68% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB 3,551 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 149 150 148 149 149 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Read 423 Write 397 Mixed 321 SusWrite 180 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 45.2 155% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 330 249% 334 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-004.A00G 9905624-010.A00G 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 48.6 MC Mixed 23.6 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 20.7 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16