Samsung 300E5K/300E5Q

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 300E5K/300E5Q  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5K-KF3BR
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170807
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 01:45
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 69%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Memory 33.7
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 43.4
24% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 40.7
8-Core 47
6% 43.8 Pts
64-Core 18.2
1% 18.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.75
4% 4.49 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 8.04
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
788GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R4F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 78 85 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 83.1
Write 98.7
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 81.2
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHC 0715 TMT425S6CFR6A-PBHJ 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5K/300E5Q Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5K/300E5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback