Samsung 300E5K/300E5Q

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 300E5K/300E5Q  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5K-KF3BR
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170807
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 23:30
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 86
2-Core 135
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 212
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.8
0% 3.2 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.9
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R4F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 84 105 106 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 32
SusWrite 98.4
63% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHC 0715 TMT425S6CFR6A-PBHJ 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 14.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5K/300E5Q Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5K/300E5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback