bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1077 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 14:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3430
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 123
56% 90 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 246
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 64GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 138 140 135 119 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 557
Write 385
Mixed 432
SusWrite 137
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 19.5
69% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 66.1
69% 120 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 92%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
92GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 87 85 93 97 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 67
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 90.8
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 6GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 2176 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback