Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory	3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170615
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '20 at 14:29
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 95 2-Core 172 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 369 37% 302 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6890 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 29 Parallax 3.97 3% 12.4 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 8.3 5% 5.69 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256S3G 256GB 519 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 111 99 115 96 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 429 Write 183 Mixed 133 SusWrite 111 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 20.3 70% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 163 139% 209 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 98%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 222GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 72 73 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 34.4 Write 40.5 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 72.1 34% 46.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FH 1x16GB 221 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.7% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.6 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	342x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	72x
Core i3-7100HIntelBench 56%, 141 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	246x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	107x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	64x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	22x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	17x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	14x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	27x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	23x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16