Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '20 at 02:24
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Memory 97.4 1-Core 158 2-Core 279 100% 178 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 970 91% 757 Pts	64-Core 1,274 79% 1,274 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.28% Terrible	Lighting 8.43 Reflection 12.6 Parallax 9.16 7% 10.1 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 7.77 Splatting 17.2 11% 13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37C0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70% Very good	Lighting 79.3 Reflection 91.5 Parallax 74.1 65% 81.7 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 78.6 Splatting 103 80% 98.1 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,654 Write 2,087 Mixed 1,399 453% 2,047 MB/s	4K Read 61.1 4K Write 211 4K Mixed 87.5 316% 120 MB/s	DQ Read 1,454 DQ Write 1,308 DQ Mixed 1,331 1,012% 1,364 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 320GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 106 105 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 158 Write 126 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 105 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 2x8GB 688 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 42.2 MC Mixed 28.7 104% 36.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 42.4 SC Mixed 33 94% 32.7 GB/s	Latency 48.7 82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	133x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	113x
Core i5-8400Intel $127Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	109x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	66x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	38x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	23x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $338

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16