Asrock H77M-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock H77M-ITX (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120425
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '20 at 17:52
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31260L 310 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 121 55% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 313 32% 260 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 14.8 Parallax 18 15% 17.2 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 20.2 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 512GB-$173 1,585 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 233 174 102 109 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 450 Write 366 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 162 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 1.8 64% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 190 163% 239 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 105%
TOSHIBA MG05ACA800E 8TB 1TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 32 32 29 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.8% Very poor	Read 20.3 Write 25 Mixed 18 SusWrite 30.2 33% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.2 MB/s

TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 424GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 32 32 29 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 81.3 Write 112 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 30.2 91% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 800GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 32 32 29 31 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 46.5 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 30.2 49% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 184GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 32 32 29 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 104 Write 109 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 30.3 86% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA MG05ACA800E 8TB 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 32 32 29 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.5% Below average	Read 106 Write 112 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 30.2 98% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.5 201% 2.27 MB/s

TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 4 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.1 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 180 Write 182 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 3.7 127% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 304GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 1.4 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 179 Write 181 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 1.3 130% 107 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 145% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 771GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 18 18 18 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 18.5 108% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 940GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 115 116 113 116 116 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 121 Write 122 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 113 147% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA MG05ACA800E 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 428GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 1.4 0.7 1 0.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.3% Below average	Read 125 Write 132 Mixed 64 SusWrite 1.4 100% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-036.A00LF 99U5471-036.A00LF 16GB 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.2% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77M-ITX Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M-ITX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	27x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	13x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	10x

GPU
RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples	20x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	10x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	9x

SSD
T253256GB 256GBTeamBench 75%, 779 samples	19x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	7x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	4x

RAM
CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GBUnknownBench 49%, 8 samples	5x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	4x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 5,493 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $261

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16