Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2815 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Memory 23.5 1-Core 12.5 2-Core 20.3 13% 18.8 Pts	4-Core 19.1 8-Core 24.3 3% 21.7 Pts	64-Core 21.9 1% 21.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Clevo(1558 5470) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.77 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.94 1% 0.91 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.13 1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 79 74 5.7 96 79 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.1% Very poor	Read 55.4 Write 16.3 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 70.6 10% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 10.2 23% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1333 1x2GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	5.22% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 0.9 5% 1.7 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.8 GB/s	Latency 296 14% 296 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.22% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	1x
Celeron N2920IntelBench 31%, 1,586 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	2x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	1x

RAM
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1333C9 8GBUnknownBench 11%, 1 sample	1x
TMT425S6CFR6A-PBHJ 1x2GBTeikonBench 15%, 53 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $14

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16