Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 196
80% 135 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 310
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 3.84
0% 3.02 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 3.33
Splatting 9.35
5% 6.15 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$34
618GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 123 127 131 150 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 120
Write 133
Mixed 32
SusWrite 132
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 107%
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4 4 4 4 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 3.8
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 4
5% 4.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
24% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback